

Question 2:
How does it compare to past atrocities?
Answer:
Abortion in no way compares to past atrocities committed against black slaves, interned Jews, Cambodian Killing Field victims, or any other group that has experienced genocide. Genocide is an intolerable act of hatred against a particular community of people. Abortion is an essential, legal medical procedure that women desperately need, not only to give them control over their bodies and lives but to preserve and improve the lives of their families. Fetuses, lacking any self awareness or ability to feel pain, cannot reasonably be compared to the millions of very sentient people able to feel pain, fear and suffering who were victimized during genocides.
Question 3:
Are the unborn human?
Answer:
The debate about the legality of abortion is often framed as being about whether or not the fetus is a human. What needs to be asked, however, is if any human, whether a fetus or adult, has the right to use another person’s body to live. Let’s consider a hypothetical man, John. John suffers from leukemia, and requires a bone marrow transplantation to survive. Now consider a second man, Matt. Matt is the only person doctors have been able to find as a match for John. John will die without the bone marrow. But does this mean that John has a right to Matt’s bone marrow?
Most people are uncomfortable with the idea of forced-organ donation. Bodily autonomy, the right of a person to decide what is done to his or her body, is one of the most important rights we have. Whether a fetus is a person is a philosophical and religious question, and the religious beliefs of one group should never be imposed on others not sharing those beliefs. But whether we believe that a fetus is a person entitled to the rights granted to persons under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or not, no person, born or “unborn”, has the right to use a non-consenting person’s body for survival.
Question 4:
What about a woman's right to choose?
Answer:
Abortion is an essential, legal medical procedure that women desperately need, not only to give them control over their bodies and lives but to preserve and improve the lives of their families. According to a study by the Guttmacher Institute, women who have abortions overwhelmingly cite their understanding of responsibilities of parenthood and family life when making their decisions. Three-fourths of women cite concern for or responsibility to other individuals; three-fourths say they cannot afford a child; three-fourths say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or the ability to care for dependents; and half say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner. Women are completely capable of understanding the complexities of abortion and the factors in their lives which lead them to consider abortion. They are autonomous beings who have the right and the ability to make decisions in their lives.
I don't think single mothers should be getting government extras. If you can't afford a child on one income in Vancouver, don't have children or move to a more affordable area. Procreation isn't our God-given right...people still have to be accountable for their behaviors. So all of you women need to stop making excuses and deal with your own problems. The government can't be responsible for every man, woman and child. Where are the fathers of these children anyway?What callous disregard for the children that this comment seems willing to throw under the bus in a rush to condemn women for having children at a time that she does not feel is appropriate. The suggestion that women who cannot afford children should not have them is not only patronizing in the extreme, but also quite useless: these women already have children. What purpose is served through this ridiculous moralizing? Does it help these children to inform their mothers that they should not have gotten pregnant in the first place? For that matter, is it the place of a complete stranger who knows nothing of a woman's situation to be dictating to her when it is and it not acceptable to have a child? The fact is, circumstances change, sometimes beyond our control. Family members get sick, creating an unexpected financial burden. Parents get laid off from jobs, resulting in an unexpected loss of income. There are many things that can lead to financial hardships.